Santoro, according to today's tg1 of 13: 30, has felt obliged to listen a second time the macro, though a witness has been called irrelevant by the courts. Annozero, continues the service, have built "a thesis, but their interest is only in the classroom and to its public Annozero Santoro", as shown by the fact that no newspaper has now spoken, but, needless to say, the fact daily, "the newspaper of Labor."
Now, I state that I have not seen the episode of Annozero, I make this simple consideration. Agree with Santoro is obviously not mandatory, and the rest there is a guarantee that you can provide a different version or criticize the approach of a program. Also call on the overflight of Masi, I consider the result dell'insulso conception that journalistic objectivity should be to not to cause sorrow to anyone.
But the "right of reply" should be assigned to the first national network news and that this is done, once again, surreptitiously, quietly passing points of view to record, by propaganda and not information, is something conceivable only in a country that Freedom House now ranks steadily over the 70th place in the world for freedom of information, and not a day passes without this information are resounding confirmation.
0 comments:
Post a Comment