Attorney John Romano: The Due Process art. 6 ECHR Advocate John Romano, president of Eurojuris, will focus its training program on just satisfaction between national courts and international courts.
Mr.. John Romano plays a lawyer since 1975. E 'attorney licensed to practice before the Supreme Court since 1993. It is, in the course of his career, busy, in particular, employment law and administrative law, as well as electoral disputes. Since 1989, dedicated a special attention to issues of due process, with attention mainly to those linked to the respect of the period of reasonable duration, taking an interest in the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in the Court of Strasbourg.
E 'was responsible for academic and educational aspects of the "Outline of the code of ethics of the European jurist, developed with the support of the European Commission as part of the" Robert Schuman "by the Council of Advocates of Benevento, in collaboration with the University of Sannio and the Center of Documentation and European Culture.
component for three-year periods, of the Bar Council of Benevento, covering the first post of Treasurer and Secretary and then was re-elected to the position of director during the elections of the 'Bar Association for the biennium 2004 / 2005.
E 'was a member of the Editorial Board of the Journal of Legal Sannio and Molise, edited by ESI of Naples.
He was part of the body of teachers set out for the training of officials in the PA, under the Operational Program submitted by the University of Sannio, Department of Public at the Presidency of the Council of Ministers.
E 'was a member of the Examination Board for obtaining authorization to pursue the profession of lawyer in the Court of Appeal of Naples, in 2000/2001.
AND 'interviewed by the following newspapers: L'Espresso, Il Sole 24 Ore, Corriere della Sera on topics related to its engagement pursued before the European Court of Human Rights, based in Strasbourg.
E 'was a member of the Scientific Committee in charge of the "course in the professions European and international law "(held in Benevento April - June 2005), produced under the auspices of the Province of Benevento and the collaboration between the Institute of International Legal Studies - Section of Naples - CNR, Department of Analysis economic and social system of the Sannio University (DASES), the Association of Eurojuris Benevento (of which the lawyer. John Romano is the President) and the Italian Society for International Organization (SIOI) - Chamber of Campania.
By decree of President of the Regional Government of Campania, 21 February 2005, was appointed Commissioner for the improvement of the Montana Community Taburno ", achieving the objective assigned to it.
He held the office of management and coordination of" The Course of specialization in the legal profession Carlo Sforza European and international level ", held in Strasbourg, at the headquarters of 'Italian Institute of Culture, from July 2 to September 7, 2007.
He played the same position even during the "Specialization Course II Carlo Sforza in European and international legal profession", held in Strasbourg, at the headquarters of the Italian culture, "from June 2 to September 6, 2008.
is directing the "Sforza Carlo III Specialization Course in European and international legal profession", held in Strasbourg, at the headquarters of the Italian culture, "from July 6 to September 5, 2009.
Programme Lessons
- WORK n.1 You have to read the classroom four documents:
- Opposition to the estimated
- Appeal Court Judgement
- Action
the Supreme Court - Supreme Defence in
After examination thereof, to be carried out taking regard to the timing of the acts will open a brief discussion to assess the possibility of appealing the matter to the international court, an appeal concerning the claim of the market value of the area under discussion.
is appropriate for the discussion focuses on:-
timely action to propose, keeping in mind that the payment of amounts not yet paid at the time of appointment;
- proposability the same in accordance with Article . 35 ECHR, in relation to this aspect, the prior exhaustion of domestic remedies.
Law Reference:
* Sentences C. 348 and 349 of the Constitution of 2007
* Judgement Brozicek c. Italy;
Judgement Belvedere Hotel * c. Italy;
* Judgement Stornaiuolo and other c. Italy;
* Judgement Pisacane and other c.Italia.
- Report on the theme "Equitable Relief in the International Court and National Courts" - WORK No 2 We offer four reconstructions of the classroom to reflection on the tips of four distinct processes assumptions made interesting for everybody to proceed to select the fact to be considered for the drafting of an application under L. 89/2001.
Law Reference:
* Judgement C. Cass. 1338/04 * Judgement
C. Cass. 1339/04 * Judgement
C. * Judgement Cass.1340/04
C. Cass. 1341/04
Solution "Case D, Montanaro, De Bonis, D'Amico Solution" Case C ", Biondi, Serino, Catharsis, Gaffney, Beatrice, Villani - WORK n . 3
the classroom are invited to a brief reflection on the jurisprudence of the European Court on two cases listed below, in order to assess the possibility of returning before the international court after the experiment of the statutory procedure Pinto with the intention to denounce aspects of the latter is ineffettività with reference to the phase of the investigation of the violation denounced, and, especially, with regards to being interesting in implementing the decision.
Simaldone * c.
Cocchiarella v. Italy * Italy
unique archive material Mr. Romano
To visit the tower must purchase a ticket (770 円 ) through which you can access the observatory above capacity of 500 people. This monitoring 
